Mon, Jul 13, 2026

Notes for Mon, Jul 13, 2026

Morning brief

· generated 07:02 ET

No new tape overnight, funding view carries, and the only live signal is one bill going special

Nothing forced a re-baseline overnight; the standing funding-over-Gulf view holds. Lone signal: B 01/21/27 spikes special while the rest of the list sits at floor.

Overnight: status quo holds

Priors carry. Nothing landed overnight that forces a re-baseline, no fresh commentary, no Tier 1 prints, no calendar event on the docket for today. The standing view runs unchallenged into the open: the marginal front-end driver is funding, not the Gulf.

We put two break tests on record and we owe PMs a check against both. Neither tripped. The Gulf hasn't reignited on a verified strike, and there's no coupon or bill upsize to react to, no supply shock crossed the tape. Both tests need external event or supply flow to evaluate, and the session gave us neither, so the accountability contract is intact and the thesis is unmoved rather than confirmed. We're not re-baselining; we're carrying.

The one live signal: a single bill going special

The only datapoint with a pulse this morning is Friday's SOMA securities-lending operation. 912797TM9 (the B 01/21/27) prints 87.7bp over the lending floor[1], a genuine outlier. The next name in, the B 12/03/26, sits at 6.6bp[2], and the rest of the top of the list clusters right there.

That gap is the read. If the front end were tightening broadly on a reserve drain, we'd expect the specials list to firm across issues, not one CUSIP spiking sixty basis points clear while everything else camps at floor. It isn't broad, it's one issue. That's the load-bearing observation: the shape of the list argues for idiosyncratic scarcity in a single bill (short base, deliverable squeeze, auction cycle), not systemic front-end tightening. We read it as a single-issue squeeze, and it does not corroborate the reserve-drain-firms-SOFR story, it sits orthogonal to it. View on the special breaks if the next operation shows the cluster lifting with it; then it's a sector, not a name.

What we can't see yet — and what confirms the funding call

The funding thesis rests on prints we can't refresh at 7 AM. Thursday's SOFR is the last fixed reference rate; Friday's drops at the 8 AM publish. TGA is staler still, Wednesday is the freshest cash balance, so the trough assumption underpinning the whole view can't be re-confirmed this morning. Assumes Treasury holds the bill-funded rebuild pace; the view gets its first real corroboration only when Friday's SOFR fixes higher into IORB with reserves still bleeding. If Friday's fix comes soft, the drain story is on the clock. Watch the 8 AM tape before adding to anything funding-driven.

Citations

  1. [1]87.7bp over the lending floor (912797TM9 (B 01/21/27) at 87.7 bp)Observation · observation:seclend_observations:912797TM9:2026-07-10
  2. [2]the B 12/03/26, sits at 6.6bp (912797VA2 (B 12/03/26) at 6.6 bp)Observation · observation:seclend_observations:912797VA2:2026-07-10

Generated by Short Rates Desk. Informational only. Not investment advice.

Close brief

· generated 16:22 ET

Front end sold oil and Waller into CPI; the plumbing said the opposite

Front end repriced hawkish on oil and Waller into CPI, but funding softened and reserves surged, the tightening corroboration didn't show.

The read

We don't read today's front-end selloff as the hawkish Fed repricing the wire is calling it. The move rode two headlines, a Strait of Hormuz oil spike, with Trump floating a 20% transit toll[1], and Waller's conditional line on core inflation, both landing the day before CPI, not a shift in the reaction function. Fed funds futures are now near 50/50 for a hike in roughly two weeks[2], and that is Waller-and-oil premium, not a new dot.

More telling than either headline: the front end is not priced at nothing. The 2y last printed 4.16% on July 9[3], roughly 54bp above EFFR at 3.62%[4] against a 3.50 - 3.75% target range[5], the market already carries about two hikes, and the FRED 2y hasn't refreshed through today's session, so we're reading that level alongside intraday commentary that has the 2y at its highest since early 2025[6]. The question isn't whether hikes are priced; they are. It's whether the tail, pricing near 50bp through mid-2027 against Goldman's ~25% hike odds[7], survives a soft print. The sharp desks lean fade: Peccatiello reads trend growth and a slack labor market as not justifying the hawkish strip[8], and Brooks calls the 40bp of 2026 hikes short on economic rationale[9]. Against them, Sahm reads the June minutes' 9-8-1 dot split as a real 40% hike path[10] the curve is discounting too cheaply. That's the two-sided event, and we won't erase either leg.

Funding contradicted the tightening view

Our morning brief put the funding-tightening call on notice: it needed Friday's SOFR to fix higher into IORB with reserves still bleeding. Neither happened. SOFR set at 3.55% on July 10[11], ten basis points below IORB at 3.65%[12], and reserve balances jumped to $3.10trln on the July 8 statement[13], up $132bn from the prior week[14], the opposite of bleeding. Overnight RRP take-up sat near empty at $0.5bn[15], and the desk is still running zero repo operations with the SOFR-IORB spread around minus 12bp[16]. That is ample cash, not scarce; the corroboration we flagged did not arrive, and the near-term funding bias softens with it. GCF Treasury repo printed 3.62% on July 10[17], a touch above SOFR but still soft to IORB.

A big piece is the Treasury General Account. TGA drained $58bn in the week to July 8[19], to $749bn from $807bn[18], cash leaving the account and landing in reserves, part of why the funding stack softened rather than firmed. That drain is liquidity-additive today. The direction is the catch: with the account roughly $205bn below target and $171bn of bills hitting this week[20], the rebuild reverses the flow and drains reserves. That's where the tightening thesis gets its second look, not today.

The special: still a name

Our morning break test on the special was clean: the view flips from a name to a sector only if the next operation shows the cluster lifting with the squeezed bill. It didn't. The January 2027 bill (912797TM9) deepened to 237.4bp special at today's SOMA operation[21], up from 87.7bp Friday[22] on $1.6bn accepted, an intensifying idiosyncratic squeeze, not a sector move, because the rest of the bill cluster sat at the 5bp floor. The one new name to flag is the 4.375s of May 2036 note at 27.3bp on $4.6bn[23], a separate ten-year specialness, not the bill story bleeding out.

Into tomorrow

Tomorrow's CPI is the fulcrum, consensus near 3.5% against the Cleveland nowcast around 4.0%[24], with Warsh's first Hill testimony the same window and DB and GS both looking for softer prints[25]. Our bias into it: fade the hawkish tail, lean the 2y lower on a soft core run-rate, and look for SOFR to firm back toward IORB over coming weeks as the bill-funded TGA rebuild drains reserves.

The view breaks two ways. A hot core print with Warsh declining to walk back the tightening talk reprices the front end higher, and the fade is wrong on the day. And the oil leg isn't settled, roughly 20 vessels still transited Hormuz in the last 24 hours[26], so this is an oil-vol and inflation-expectations impulse, not a proven supply loss; a verified multi-week transit stall would harden the stagflation premium the long end is starting to price. We assume Treasury holds the bill-issuance pace; a coupon upsize at refunding changes the reserve path and the funding call with it. One tail to monitor, not trade: equity-financing stress, with dealers charging north of 150bp over SOFR to fund leveraged longs[27], an indirect proxy, but a plumbing warning if equities wobble.

Sources read

8 sources read

  • Commentary items: 8

Citations

  1. [1]Trump floating a 20% transit toll (Trump's 20% toll threat on cargo transit, combined with active US-Iran strikes)Commentary · zerohedge.com
  2. [2]near 50/50 for a hike in roughly two weeks (fed funds futures now 50/50 for a move in ~2 weeks)Commentary · peterboockvar.substack.com
  3. [3]The 2y last printed 4.16% on July 9 (4.16)FRED DGS2 · Jul 9, 2026
  4. [4]EFFR at 3.62% (3.62)NY Fed EFFR · Jul 10, 2026
  5. [5]3.50 - 3.75% target range (3.75 upper bound, 3.50 lower bound)FRED DFEDTARU · Jul 13, 2026
  6. [6]the 2y at its highest since early 2025 (2yr Treasuries touch highest since early 2025)Commentary · zerohedge.com
  7. [7]pricing near 50bp through mid-2027 against Goldman's ~25% hike odds (pricing ~50bp hikes through mid-2027 vs. Goldman's 25% hike-probability baseline)Commentary · zerohedge.com
  8. [8]Peccatiello reads trend growth and a slack labor market as not justifying the hawkish strip (trend growth, slack labor market, disinflationary wage/income signals, shelter CPI rolling over)Commentary · themacrocompass.substack.com
  9. [9]Brooks calls the 40bp of 2026 hikes short on economic rationale (Market pricing of 40 bps hikes through 2026 lacks economic rationale)Commentary · robinjbrooks.substack.com
  10. [10]Sahm reads the June minutes' 9-8-1 dot split as a real 40% hike path (dot plot showed 9-8-1 split... that's a 40% tail the market is discounting too heavily)Commentary · stayathomemacro.substack.com
  11. [11]SOFR set at 3.55% on July 10 (3.55)NY Fed SOFR · Jul 10, 2026
  12. [12]IORB at 3.65% (3.65)FRED IORB · Jul 13, 2026
  13. [13]jumped to $3.10trln on the July 8 statement (3098911)FRED WRESBAL · Jul 8, 2026
  14. [14]up $132bn from the prior week (2966897)FRED WRESBAL · Jul 1, 2026
  15. [15]RRP take-up sat near empty at $0.5bn (0.545)FRED RRPONTSYD · Jul 10, 2026
  16. [16]the desk is still running zero repo operations with the SOFR-IORB spread around minus 12bp (Fed still running zero SRPs despite SOFR-IORB spread at -12bps)Commentary · conks.plumbing
  17. [17]GCF Treasury repo printed 3.62% on July 10 (UST 3.62100)DTCC GCF repo · Jul 10, 2026
  18. [18]to $749bn from $807bn (749244)Treasury General Account · Jul 8, 2026
  19. [19]TGA drained $58bn in the week to July 8 (807359)Treasury General Account · Jul 1, 2026
  20. [20]roughly $205bn below target and $171bn of bills hitting this week (TGA $205bln below target, reserve balances up $132bln in two days (now $3.10trln))Commentary · conks.plumbing
  21. [21]deepened to 237.4bp special at today's SOMA operation (237.4 bp, $1.63B accepted)Observation · observation:seclend_observations:912797TM9:2026-07-13
  22. [22]up from 87.7bp Friday (87.7 bp, $1.43B accepted)Observation · observation:seclend_observations:912797TM9:2026-07-10
  23. [23]4.375s of May 2036 note at 27.3bp on $4.6bn (27.3 bp, $4.58B accepted)Observation · observation:seclend_observations:91282CQQ7:2026-07-13
  24. [24]consensus near 3.5% against the Cleveland nowcast around 4.0% (consensus 3.5% vs. Cleveland Fed nowcast 4.0%)Commentary · zerohedge.com
  25. [25]DB and GS both looking for softer prints (DB/GS both forecasting softer prints with headline CPI down to 3.81% YoY)Commentary · zerohedge.com
  26. [26]roughly 20 vessels still transited Hormuz in the last 24 hours (20 vessels transited in last 24h per US military)Commentary · zerohedge.com
  27. [27]dealers charging north of 150bp over SOFR to fund leveraged longs (Equity repo rates have blown out to +150bps over SOFR)Commentary · conks.plumbing

Generated by Short Rates Desk. Informational only. Not investment advice.